Warner Bros Discovery’s problem is mismanagement, not structure


Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

When will the clock run out on David Zaslav? The Financial Times has reported that Warner Bros Discovery, the media conglomerate assembled just two years ago by Zaslav, its chief executive, could seek a break-up. The most dramatic option is to create two companies with very distinct growth and profit profiles. 

It is all exhausting. Zaslav famously is known for taking home big paychecks — and more recently for offending everyone in sight. Stockholders have seen shares fall nearly 70 per cent in those 27 months. Customers do not like content disappearing from their streaming apps. And the talent, including Charles Barkley of professional basketball fame, wonder if his mismanagement is going to cost them their jobs. At some point Zaslav must be accountable.

The idea of a separation would be to put the low-growth but cash-generative cable TV stations, including TNT and CNN, into a company that takes on most of WBD’s $39bn of net debt. Bondholders will seethe and perhaps sue. A creditor war has erupted at Lionsgate, the Hollywood studio that recently spun off the cable network Starz and tried a similar debt shell game to the one that WBD is contemplating.

Line chart of Share price, $ showing Warner Bros Discovery has struggled since its mega-merger

CreditSights, the research firm, wonders if such a move could pass muster given that a major asset disposal is still prohibited by bond indentures. But the debt contracts were struck in a pretty loose era for a solidly investment grade company. WBD, at the very least, might be able to get creditors to take haircuts in debt exchanges.

The WBD streaming business, which only recently turned profitable, would be largely debt-free and could supposedly get a Netflix-like valuation. Alternatively, it could cleanly combine with some other digital also-ran. In investment banking logic, 1 + 1 will then equal 3. But that looks tricky: four times debt to ebitda is immutable.

Zaslav is not the only media mogul struggling in this time of high interest rates and technological upheaval. The pie is shrinking and chief executives are making tough choices on allocating capital and enterprise value. Creditor skirmishes are already flaring up at the likes of Dish Network and Altice. Managers are resorting to the bromide that their duties are to shareholders not creditors. That is simply a damning albeit tacit admission of how far their efforts have fallen short.

sujeet.indap@ft.com 



Source link

Content Disclaimer and Copyright Notice
Content Disclaimer

The content provided on this website is sourced from various RSS feeds and other publicly available sources. We strive to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information, and we always provide source links to the original content. However, we are not responsible for the content’s accuracy or any changes made to the original sources after the information is aggregated on our site.

Fair Use and Copyright Notice

This website may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We believe this constitutes a “fair use” of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *